Canine Standards Atlas

The Atlas

Welfare, Law & Identification

The foundation beneath everything else. Modern welfare rests on two founding ideas: the Five Freedoms, set out in the 1960s, and their successor the Five Domains Model, which together define what good welfare means and now sit beneath welfare law and inspection worldwide. The standards below turn those ideas into duties that can be enforced.

Lawenforceable in court Accreditedindependently audited Standardpublished Voluntarya chosen code
Terrestrial Animal Health Code (International) Standard
World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)

Maintained by the intergovernmental body representing well over a hundred countries, this code sets international reference standards for animal health and welfare, with specific chapters on humane stray-dog population control and rabies prevention. Member countries are expected to align their national rules with it, making it the closest thing to a global baseline for how dogs are treated.

Code of Welfare: Dogs (New Zealand) Standard
National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC), New Zealand

New Zealand’s code of welfare for dogs, issued by the Minister on the advice of the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee under the Animal Welfare Act 1999. It translates the Act’s duty of care into numbered minimum standards covering food and body condition, water, exercise, and the conditions and limits on the containment and tethering of dogs, usable as evidence in proceedings.

Animal Welfare Act 2006 (UK) Law
UK Government (Defra)

The principal animal welfare law for England and Wales. It places a legal duty of care on anyone responsible for a dog, requiring them to meet its needs for diet, environment, company, normal behavior and protection from suffering. Causing unnecessary suffering, or failing that duty, is a criminal offense, enforced through the courts, the police and bodies such as the RSPCA.

Animal Welfare Act (US) Law
United States, enforced by USDA APHIS

The federal animal welfare statute in the United States, enforced by the Department of Agriculture’s inspection service. It licenses and inspects commercial dog breeders, dealers, exhibitors and research facilities, setting minimum standards for housing, handling, feeding and veterinary care. Unannounced inspections back it, and breaches bring civil and criminal penalties.

Tierschutz-Hundeverordnung (Germany) Law
Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), Germany

Germany’s federal ordinance on the keeping of dogs, made under the Animal Welfare Act and the instrument that turns its general duty into measurable rules. It sets minimum kennel and indoor floor space scaled to the dog’s shoulder height, limits tethering, requires daily exercise and human contact, and bans prong collars and other painful aids in training, enforced by the regional veterinary authorities.

2. Tierhaltungsverordnung (Austria) Law
Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, Austria

Austria’s second animal-keeping ordinance under the Federal Animal Protection Act, the operative detail beneath the Act’s welfare duties. Among its dog rules are a minimum usable kennel area of fifteen square meters, a default that several dogs be kept together as a social group, daylight and exercise requirements, and a rule against separating puppies from the mother before eight weeks of age.

Tierschutzverordnung (Switzerland) Law
Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (BLV), Switzerland

Switzerland’s detailed federal ordinance under the Animal Welfare Act, the instrument that turns the Act’s principles into species-specific keeping rules. For dogs it defines and requires free outdoor movement (Auslauf), and sets conditions for housing, social contact, care and commercial keeping, applied by the cantonal veterinary services under the federal food safety and veterinary office.

Ley 7/2023 de protección de los derechos y el bienestar de los animales (Spain) Law
Government of Spain

Spain’s 2023 animal rights and welfare law, which replaced a patchwork of regional rules with a single national framework for keeping dogs. It requires owners to complete responsible-ownership training, restricts commercial breeding to registered breeders, bans the retail sale of dogs, cats and ferrets in pet shops, and prohibits aversive training collars, enforced through administrative penalties.

Besluit houders van dieren (Netherlands) Law
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature, Netherlands

The Dutch decree on keepers of animals, made under the Animals Act (Wet dieren) and the operative layer beneath its duty of care. It requires dogs to be identified by microchip and registered, obliges commercial keepers to hold a certificate of professional competence, and forbids breeding in ways that harm the welfare of the parent animal or its offspring, enforced by the food and product safety authority.

Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (Japan) Law
Ministry of the Environment, Japan

Japan’s principal animal-welfare statute, which sets a duty to keep animals in a safe, healthy, species-appropriate way and regulates the commercial animal trade. Businesses that handle animals, including dog breeders, dealers, boarders and pet shops, must register with the prefectural governor and meet conditions on how animals are kept, with the prefectures inspecting and enforcing.

Microchipping of Cats and Dogs Regulations 2023 (UK) Law
UK Government (Defra)

Microchipping has been compulsory for dogs in England since 2016. Every dog must be chipped and recorded on a compliant database with the keeper’s details kept current; the duty now sits in the 2023 regulations, which replaced the 2015 dog rules and extended chipping to cats. Owners who fail can be served notice and fined, linking each dog to a responsible keeper.